4 Signs that a Marriage Will End in Divorce
Email this article to a friend

Photo by traceyisanozzy
Experts found that there are four quick and easy, but reliable, signs that a marriage won’t last.
Can you tell if these intelligent, attractive, seemingly happy, twenty-something, newlyweds named Sue and Bill are headed for divorce? Their communication styles are analyzed in this article. Then, I share tips on what to do if you recognize any of the four signs in your own marriage or relationship.
Sue and Bill were asked to discuss a point of contention in their marriage for one hour on videotape.
They chose their new large puppy, living with them in their small apartment. Sue wanted to keep it, but Bill didn’t.
They never raised their voices to each other or showed any overt anger. On the contrary, they smiled and laughed a lot while they discussed this topic.
VIDEO OF SUE AND BILL
Sue: Sweetie! She’s not smelly …
Bill: Did you smell her today?
Sue: I smelled her. She smelled good. I petted her, and my hands didn’t stink or feel oily. Your hands have never smelled oily.
Bill: Yes, Sir.
Sue: I’ve never let my dog get oily.
Bill: Yes, Sir. She’s a dog.
Sue: My dog has never gotten oily. You’d better be careful.
Bill: No, you’d better be careful.
Sue: No, you’d better be careful. … Don’t call my dog oily, Boy.
This married couple, and many others like them, were studied at the world famous “Love Lab” at the University of Washington. Dr. John Gottman, Ph.D., is a marriage and divorce expert and researcher there.
He and his team of researchers narrowed down the telltale signs of a marriage headed for divorce to only four. How his studies led him to this conclusion is explained in Malcolm Gladwell’s excellent book Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking (2005). The four signs, which Dr. Gottman calls the “Four Horsemen,” are: (1) defensiveness; (2) stonewalling; (3) criticising; and (4) showing contempt.
FOUR HORSEMEN OF THE DIVORCE APOCALYPSE
1. Defensiveness: An example is the “yes but” tactic of, first, appearing to agree, then, taking it back. It’s a bait and switch trick, deceptive and manipulative. The listener is taken for an emotional rollercoaster ride from hopeful to frustrated, to annoyed, and, eventually, to angry. This type of behavior erodes trust in a relationship because it is sneaky, hypocritical, and so confusing to listeners that they may end up feeling guilty, or unsure of themselves, for getting mad.
2. Stonewalling: Men tend to stonewall more than women. They shut down and refuse to communicate anymore about the problem. Or, they are inflexible. This behavior is a total rejection of the other person’s concerns, feelings, and needs.
3. Criticizing: Women tend to be more critical than men. Criticisms are sweeping, overbroad attacks on a person’s character, such as “You never listen” or “You are really selfish and insensitive.” Criticisms cause defensiveness.
4. Showing Contempt: This is the single most important sign that a marriage is in trouble. Even without the other three, if this is one is present in your marriage, chances are high that you will divorce. To express contempt is to act like you are better than the other person and, therefore, can treat them worse than most people. Examples are harsh condemnations like “You’re a dick,” or “You’re a bitch.”
Contempt is very similar to disgust. Both completely reject the person as not worthy of any consideration, let alone respect. A classic example of this is rolling your eyes while your spouse is talking. Another example is ignoring, or being completely dismissive of, your spouse’s complaints or requests for validation.
BACK TO SUE AND BILL
When all four of these signs exist, chances are very high that your marriage won’t last. And, these clues can be found in even the briefest arguments between married couples. For example, in the video of Sue and Bill, Bill began the conversation with “I guess I’m just not a dog person.” Then, he confusingly said that he liked their old dog but just not their new dog. He didn’t seem angry or annoyed. He looked like he just wanted to explain his feelings.
Sue rolled her eyes very quickly a few times while Bill was talking. At one point, Bill began to talk about how he really didn’t like the dog’s living quarters. Sue reacted by closing her eyes and then responded in a patronizing, lecturing voice. Bill said that he didn’t want a fence in the living room. Sue said, “I don’t want to argue about that,” and rolled her eyes again. Stonewalling and Contempt.
Bill tried a different argument by complaining that the dog hurt their social life because it forced them to come home early to make sure it didn’t destroy their apartment. Sue replied that was not true and argued back, “If she’s going to chew anything, she’s going to do it in the first fifteen minutes that we’re gone.” He acted like he agreed by nodding and saying, “Yeah, I know.” But, he added, “I’m not saying it’s rational. I just don’t want to have a dog.” First, he acts like he’s validating her point by starting with the “Yeah, I know.” Then, he gets defensive again by restating his original position of not wanting the dog. The “yes but” tactic.
Then, Bill wanted some validation from Sue. He said, “I’m getting way better. You’ve got to admit it. I’m better this week than last week, and the week before, and the week before.” Sue ignored him. In study after study at the Love Lab, married couples that nodded and said, “You’re right,” or “Uh-huh,” or “Yeah,” in response to their spouse’s requests for validation during arguments stayed together, while those who didn’t got divorced. It’s a sign of support.
Sue and Bill look like they are calmly discussing whether they should keep their dog. But, what’s they are really doing is cementing a harmful pattern of interaction that will repeat whenever they disagree. She is completely inflexible and unsupportive of him. He is defensive, indirect, and dishonest about his true feelings. They look like happy newlyweds, but the Love Lab doubted they’d last seven years.
COUNSELING TIPS
1. If your partner wants validation, give it without using the “yes but” tactic. It doesn’t mean you agree with everything they say or that you are losing the argument. It means you still care about them and are willing to show it.
2. If you agree with a point they make, say so and stop there. Don’t add a “but” statement. That only negates all the benefits of the agreement—and then some.
3. Don’t cross your arms, turn away, or walk away in the middle of a discussion. These are all examples of stonewalling. If you need a “time out,” communicate this need and agree to continue at a specified time that is good for both of you.
4. When expressing your needs or concerns, be direct, specific, and polite. Don’t criticize the other person. Ask for what you want or need. Then, really listen to what the other person wants or needs. Be willing to compromise.
5. Don’t roll your eyes, make disparaging noises, or throw your hands up in the air. Express your frustration before you get exasperated, again, using direct, specific, and polite words. Say something like, “I feel ignored when you interrupt me. Please let me finish my point.” It’s harder but worth the effort as long as your partner is honestly trying to communicate, too.
CONCLUSION
We can all improve our communication skills, especially when it comes to arguments. We can’t avoid all arguments, and we shouldn’t try. Relationships grow the most from conflict and healthy conflict resolution. Be honest but respectful about expressing your annoyances, frustrations, needs, and wants. Give validations frequently and sincerely. Keep your eyes on the prize of real conflict resolution—which always involves compromise on both sides—so you can get back to the business of living a harmonious life. Then, all of this gets a whole lot easier.
If you would like a copy of Blink, you can buy it from Amazon.com: click here.
Be sure to get the latest articles as soon as they’re posted by signing up here!








April 17th, 2008 at 12:45 am
That is excellent, thanks. I reviewed it on my own site.
April 17th, 2008 at 6:52 am
Thanks, Elie! Good luck with your inspiring goal of becoming a mediator in Israel. I read parts of your blog Better Than Misery and loved everything I read! Your writing is very heartfelt and sometimes heartbreaking. I not only enjoyed the brevity and frankness of your entries—at times, I was moved to profound sadness combined with wonder about the state of human relations and communications today. I hope you will always continue writing and sharing. Your words are pure and true.
June 28th, 2008 at 8:38 am
I found this link at Problogger and I think this is a great post. You’re right, it is still the content king that makes an archive post like this very much alive.
Ironically, I made a similar post about a month ago - How to avoid a potential Divorce. I pointed out there that although there could be some misunderstanding in a marriage, one of the major things spouses should do is to rest for a while instead of insisting who is right and who is wrong.
June 28th, 2008 at 9:17 am
Hi Guardian Angel! Thanks for your comment! So true that trying to establish blame is counter-productive. Rather, it helps to seek to understand what is really bothering each person about the situation. Is it that someone feels ignored, slighted, ridiculed, or something else unpleasant? If so, most of us would want to help remedy that situation because we don’t really want to cause the people we love that kind of pain. There is no “right” or “wrong” with our perceptions and hurt feelings. They just are. And, the best way to help address them is to first acknowledge those perceptions and feelings as legitimate and worthy of our serious attention and efforts to try to help alleviate them, to thank our loved ones for their honestly in sharing their feelings with us, and to express our sincere desire to do whatever we reasonably can and to change whatever we realistically can to stop their pain and regain their trust and reestablish their comfort level. Do all this, and I’m sure they will be more than willing to reciprocate the next time our feelings are hurt due to our perceptions of having been mistreated by them! : )
July 1st, 2008 at 9:26 am
I LOVE this, I might use it on my blog and am definitely going to forward it on to my friends.
I hope you don’t mind but I’d love to leave a link to a post I wrote called “Should I Leave My Husband?” You should see the response from so many single moms on when they knew it was high time to get out.
http://mssinglemama.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/should-i-leave-my-husband/
Thanks and have a great day Shanel!
July 1st, 2008 at 11:24 am
Well, hello again, Ms. Single Mama! Thanks for your comment! Of course I don’t mind you or anyone else leaving relevant links on any of my posts. I loved your post and all the amazing comments your readers left about it! I left my own comment after reading all of them — that took quite a while! I hope you do write about this article on your blog. Please let me know if you do; I don’t want to miss it! : )
July 8th, 2008 at 10:08 pm
About stonewalling:
“2. Stonewalling: Men tend to stonewall more than women. They shut down and refuse to communicate anymore about the problem. Or, they are inflexible. This behavior is a total rejection of the other person’s concerns, feelings, and needs.”
When a person feels attacked, it is natural to “fight”, “flight” or “freeze”. If not saying a word is an involuntary response to an attack I think it’s wrong to call it stonewalling and judging it as a “total rejection of the other person’s concerns, feelings, and needs”.
When someone reaches the end of means of communications, only the fight/flight/freeze responses are left. To say that a person chooses these deliberately I think is completely wrong.
Stonewalling can be used as a means of power, but I think it’s more often the very last line of defence against critique that is uncalled for.
July 8th, 2008 at 10:33 pm
Hi A! Thank you for your comment! I can see why someone who feels suddenly attacked might be taken aback for a while and, even, too hurt to respond for a short time. However, that is not what stonewalling is. Stonewalling is a systematic and stubborn stance of refusing to talk about problems. At some point, even if you continue to feel attacked by your loved one, you should at least express that feeling to him/her and ask them to stop hurting you. Why? Because you want to try to make the relationship work. Of course, if you don’t want the relationship to work, this is all moot. But, if you want the relationship to work, you have to at least let them that know they hurt you, specifically why what they said hurt you, and give them the chance to change their hurtful communication style — if that’s the reason why you feel justified in stonewalling them. It sounds like you believe stonewalling is an acceptable response to criticisms from your spouse. I respectfully disagree.